RB Leipzig v
M'gladbach
RB Leipzig 58%
WinPIQ does not see enough of an edge at the current price.
WinPIQ's call is PASS on RB Leipzig vs M'gladbach. RB Leipzig is the most likely result, but the price does not clear WinPIQ's bar.
- WinPIQ probabilityWinPIQ's estimate of the chance this outcome happens, from 0–100%. It is not a promise: a 70% call still loses about 3 times in 10.
- 58%
- Fair price (WinPIQ)The odds WinPIQ's own probability implies, with no bookmaker margin — the 'true' price before the house's cut.
- 1.74
- Minimum priceThe lowest price at which this selection still has value — below it, the price no longer compensates for the risk.
- 1.90
- ConfidenceHow sure WinPIQ is about this call, combining model agreement, data and lineup certainty — one label, not a score.
- High confidence
Quick verdict
- StrengthTeam strength supports this pick
- StrengthAttacking strength supports this pick
- OtherModel fair price 1.74 vs 1.55 in the market — the market is more optimistic than the model.
- FormRecent form works against this pick
- OtherRB Leipzig are missing 12 players
No verified expert prediction was found for this match.
Squad readiness
Doubtful: M. Esteve, L. Klostermann, A. Kone
3 doubtful
Full-strength squad expected.
Market & price
No operator price is available right now
fair 1.74The odds WinPIQ's own probability implies, with no bookmaker margin — the 'true' price before the house's cut.acceptable from 1.90The lowest price at which this selection still has value — below it, the price no longer compensates for the risk.
Form
RB Leipzig's form has been about average once opponent strength is factored in.
M'gladbach have been in strong form once opponent strength is factored in.
What could change the call?
- No verified expert prediction was found for this match.
Post-match summary
Market
Market vs AI
| Selection | AI | Market (no-vig) | Price | Fair | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57.5% | — | — | 1.74 | — |
| X | 23.1% | — | — | 4.32 | — |
| 2 | 19.3% | — | — | 5.18 | — |
Decision state · WINPIQ PASS
Kickoff has passed; the pre-match analysis no longer applies
Why Analysis expired? ↓
Price zones and decision states are model-generated decision support — not a guaranteed outcome. No countdowns: “valid until” is the next real price refresh.
Market coherence · same thesis, different market
Cross-market residuals and margin map (Edge) ↓
Disagreement between markets is “cross-market discrepancy — review”, not an opportunity. Margin shows embedded cost per market structure — never an instruction to stake more.
More markets
Advanced
We found no real edge in this match.
Probability ≠ confidence ≠ edge ≠ recommendation. Four different numbers, on purpose.
- Probability
- 58%
- Fair odds (AI)
- 1.74
- Operator price
- no price
- Market (no-vig)
- —
- Edge
- -3.5 pp
- EV at the operator price
- —
- Confidence
- 85/100
- Model agreement
- 4/4
- Risk
- Medium
Why 56? ↓
- How clear the match is to the model21.3/25
- How many of our analysts agree15/15
- How much more than the odds we give it0/25
- How many bookmakers price the match10/10
- A price you can take right now0/5
The call (No edge) follows fixed rules on edge and confidence — not the score.
- Model
- 58%
- Edge
- −3.5pp
- Conviction
- Low
- Uncertainty
- Low
AI Committee
- 1. RB Leipzig are missing 12 players HIGH
- 2. 3 doubtful player(s) on RB Leipzig's side — the XI is not settled MEDIUM
Why?
Risks
- Recent form (5 matches): −3.2
- Adjusted form (vs expectation): −1.8
- The picture is still forming — no call yet.
What could change the call?
- No verified expert prediction was found for this match.
Probability distribution
The case · 1
balance +7RB Leipzig are missing 12 players
- team strength (+7.0)
- All 4 models agree
- attack (+2.8)
- Starting XI confirmed
- home advantage (+1.3)
- RB Leipzig are missing 12 players
- recent form (-3.2)
- 3 doubtful player(s) on RB Leipzig's side — the XI is not settled
- adjusted form (-1.8)
- Two or more models switch away from the pick
Derived from stored factors, model votes, market movement and lineups — not written to persuade.
Team strength
Recent form
Proof & history
Prediction Proof
- Id
- MQ-000056.v2
- Published
- Fri 28 Aug · 08:56 UTC
- Locked
- not yet
- Model
- ens_v0.1
- Hash
- 9a855…62b9
- Version
- v2 (previous: MQ-000056)
Prediction timeline
- Fri 28 Aug · 08:42 UTCInitial model · 1 58%
- Fri 28 Aug · 08:56 UTCVersion 2 · 1 58% (+0pp) · Market prices added